Pensions Management - the magazine for pension & investment industry professionals
RSS

BT slashes dividend
Published:  01 June, 2009

Khalaf: good time to cut

BT has cut its dividend share price in an effort to plug a £4bn funding gap in its pension scheme.

The company has also agreed with the pension scheme trustees to pay £525m a year for the next three years to assist in clearing the deficit, a decision that has been approved by the Pensions Regulator.

The decision to cut dividends to 6.5p, down from 15.8p last year, “rebases dividend payments to a level that we are confident is sustainable”, according to group chairman Sir Mike Rake.

Hargreaves Lansdown said that the BT scheme’s deficit was typical of the funding position of UK defined benefit (DB) schemes, citing research that shows 87% of schemes are in deficit, with a combined shortfall of £205bn.

BT reported in its annual results that the scheme had a deficit of £2.9bn, in contrast to £2bn surplus in 2008, although some commentators have suggested that alternative calculations could give the scheme a deficit of around £11bn.

Laith Khalaf, pensions analyst at Hargreaves Lansdown, said: “BT will not be the only company that needs to find cash to plug its pension deficit and now is actually a good time to announce a dividend cut because the market expects bad news.

“But firms that still offer final salary pensions will not forget the unwelcome strain on their cash flow throughout the downturn and will be reluctant to see through the next business cycle with these schemes still in tow.”

Rake said that the BT board was “committed to delivering attractive returns for shareholders” and was confident that improvements to the business model would generate enough cash flow to allow the dividend to increase again.






User Login
You are not logged in.
Username:

Password:

remember me
E-mail Updates

Poll

The Money Advice Service is an elegant and innovative way of providing consumers with much needed help to access financial services products.

  • Absolutely. Should have happened years ago.
  • It's a start. Let's hope it's a solid foundation.
  • Not sure either way.
  • It's not advice, but you only find that out in the small print, which nobody reads.
  • Are you having a laugh? It's another way for the regulator to raise a fighting fund to paper over the cracks in its regulatory armoury.

Subscription Contacts Privacy policy Terms and Conditions Webmaster


Mailing address: Financial Times Ltd, Number One Southwark Bridge, London, SE1 9HL, United Kingdom

© The Financial Times Limited 2011